As Spain and Argentina went into extra time during the World Cup on Sunday, conversations among my friends quickly took shape. “More gameplay? On top of 90 hard minutes? How can they keep going?”
Training, trophies, bonuses, maybe even the hopes and dreams of your country—pushing your team beyond what they think is possible can be daunting, but it can be done. It just takes the right tools and techniques.
This week, research from Niko Matouschek and Luis Rayo offers clues on what can motivate teams beyond cash alone. Plus, a former swimming prodigy—and Kellogg professor—offers advice on achieving excellence by building resilience.
Motivating with more
Money doesn’t always buy happiness—at least that’s what many modern-day workers seem to believe.
Employees at U.S. companies are increasingly prioritizing purpose in their jobs over pay. And many businesses have responded in kind, donating $44 billion to charity in 2024—a 9 percent bump from the prior year. So it makes sense that some companies are trying philanthropy as an incentive strategy, says professor of strategy Niko Matouschek.
“Many companies give so they can win over consumers. [The software company] Group Elephant points to a different motive for giving: making work more meaningful, which can help companies attract and motivate employees,” Matouschek says.
But when best to deploy this tactic? Matouschek, alongside fellow professor of strategy Luis Rayo, built a theoretical model to examine when companies should use donations rather than cash alone as a motivational tool.
The economists found there can be significant financial upside for a company that donates more as its workers’ performance rises. This tactic can be even more lucrative for a company than offering employee bonuses—particularly in team settings where employees’ individual and group performances are closely tethered together.
“Our results suggest that firm-funded donations are not mere corporate philanthropy layered on top of incentives,” Matouschek says. “They are an integral, public component of the compensation contract.”
Read more at Kellogg Insight.