Seeking Pleasure? Or Avoiding Pain?
Skip to content
Insight Unpacked Season 3: Can We Still Build a Green Economy? | Listen
Seeking Pleasure? Or Avoiding Pain?
Marketing Apr 6, 2007

Seeking Pleasure? Or Avoiding Pain?

It all depends upon how customers view themselves

Based on the research of

Jennifer L. Aaker

Angela Y. Lee

Will your customers respond more strongly to advertising that promises fun, happiness and prosperity? Or will an ad stressing the avoidance of illness or hardship be a better sell?

The answer depends on how your customers see themselves, says Kellogg Marketing Professor Angela Lee. Those who define themselves as individuals - for example, stereotypical Americans -probably will respond more to ads that promise greater enjoyment in life.

Those who see themselves primarily as members of a larger group - for example, people in East Asian cultures - tend to pay more attention to ads suggesting a product will help them avoid a negative fate.

“In the United States, we tend to focus on ‘self-enhancement,’” notes Lee, who investigates the impact of cultural differences on consumer behavior. “We want to better ourselves.

“But in China and other East Asian countries, people tend to see themselves as part of a larger group. It is a more self-critical culture, and people focus more on responsibilities, obligations and security.”

For the Chinese and others with this “interdependent self-view,” membership in the group takes precedence over individual achievement. Therefore, they will respond most strongly to threats to their ability to interact with the group.

They are also more risk-averse, Lee notes, and more influenced by ads that focus on avoiding undesirable outcomes. Ads with a “prevention focus” - those that promise to spare the customer from negative consequences such as disease or danger - appeal more strongly, in general, to those with this view.

Lee says marketers can increase their effectiveness by ensuring that ads appeal to their desired audience’s self-view.

“We pay more attention to what is relevant to us,” says Lee, who published her findings with co-researcher Jennifer L. Aaker of Stanford University in a June 2001 article in the Journal of Consumer Research.

A North American audience in Lee’s study, for example, responded more favorably to sample ads for a tennis racket when these ads stressed the glory of winning a tournament. A Chinese audience, meanwhile, was more persuaded by messages stressing the importance of not losing the tournament.

But self-view can be manipulated, Lee adds, through “priming” - the practice of exposing customers to stimuli that lead them to think about themselves or others in a certain way.

In Lee’s study, for example, the Chinese audiences were read a statement encouraging them to think of their individual interests. They were told they were about to play a championship tennis match and had the chance to bring home a large trophy for themselves.

The North American study subjects, meanwhile, were told their team’s hopes rested on their performance in the match, thus priming them to think in a more interdependent way.

Afterward, the typical Chinese response to the tennis-racket ad reflected a desire to seek a positive outcome, while the North American subjects responded more warmly to advertising that played to their desire to avoid a negative result.

“The notion that people with an independent self-view seek out pleasures while those with an interdependent self view avoid pains helps explain why different people adopt different strategies to achieve their goals,” Lee says.

“What makes it even more interesting is the fact that the way we look at ourselves is not fixed. We are very adaptive and can project ourselves in a different light as the situation changes.”

About the Writer
Rebecca Lindell, staff writer for the Kellogg School of Management. Article featured originally in Kellogg World, Spring 2002
About the Research
Aaker, Jennifer L. and Angela Y. Lee (2001), "I Seek Pleasures and We Avoid Pains: The Role of Self Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (June), 33-49.
Most Popular This Week
  1. Can We Take the Doom Out of Scrolling?
    Today’s social-media feeds elevate toxicity and partisanship. A new algorithm offers hope for a less-hostile, more-enjoyable experience.
  2. Podcast: Why Wall Street Slowed Its Roll on Sustainability
    A few years ago, the stock market was wild about green tech and ESG funds. And then it wasn’t. We look at why in the third episode of “Insight Unpacked: Can We Still Build a Green Economy?”
  3. Is AI Mastering the Art of Persuasion?
    “If AI continues along even a similar path and speed as we’re seeing now, then this becomes less of a Black Mirror episode and more of reality.”
  4. AI Is Wiping Out Entry-level Jobs. Here’s How to Surf the Wave and Not Get Crushed by It.
    The story is both more hopeful, and more complicated, than the data suggest.
  5. Does GameStop Signal the End of Short Selling as We Know It?
    A conversation with a prominent short seller about the possible consequences of a wild week on Wall Street.
  6. When the Fog Rolls In, Do Leaders Need a Map or a Compass?
    Some moments call for a business plan, while others call for adaptability. Here’s how to know when to lean on one or the other.
  7. What a Legendary Winemaker Can Teach Us about Leadership
    A renowned viticulturist helped turn Portugal’s Douro Valley into one of the world’s great wine regions. His philosophy holds value beyond the vineyard.
  8. Take 5: When the Going Gets Tough, Lead
    Kellogg faculty offer advice to help leaders navigate major challenges, from heated disagreements and hidden biases to “life quakes.”
More in Marketing
2211 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208
© Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern
University. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.