Podcast: When Teams Mess Up, Who Takes the Fall?
Skip to content
A magazine of research and ideas from the
faculty of the Kellogg School of Management
Podcast: When Teams Mess Up, Who Takes the Fall?
itunes download
Careers Dec 18, 2019

Podcast: When Teams Mess Up, Who Takes the Fall?

On this episode of The Insightful Leader: how to make sure you’re not blaming the wrong person.

Based on the research of

Ginger Zhe Jin

Benjamin F. Jones

Susan Feng Lu

Brian Uzzi

Listening: When Teams Mess Up, Who Takes the Fall?
download
0:00 Skip back button Play Skip forward button 11:24

These days, more and more work is happening in teams. However, it’s often difficult to see who on the team did what. So how do we allocate blame when a team project goes wrong?

Research from Benjamin Jones, a professor of strategy at Kellogg, and Brian Uzzi, a professor of management and organizations, finds that we often point the finger at the wrong individuals. What’s more, the people who are left holding the bag are often not the same people who get the credit when things go right. “That double standard should make us question how we give credit and how we give blame,” says Uzzi.

So how can leaders guard against this bias?

Note: The Insightful Leader is produced for the ear, and not meant to be read as a transcript. We encourage you to listen to the audio version above. However, a transcript of this episode is available here.

Featured Faculty
Benjamin F. Jones

Gordon and Llura Gund Family Professor of Entrepreneurship; Professor of Strategy; Co-Director of the Ryan Institute on Complexity; Professor of Economics (Courtesy)

Brian Uzzi

Richard L. Thomas Professor of Leadership and Organizational Change; Co-Director, Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems (NICO); Co-Director, Ryan Institute on Complexity; Professor of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, McCormick School (Courtesy); Professor of Sociology, Weinberg

About the Research
Jin, Ginger Zhe, Benjamin Jones, Susan Feng Lu, and Brian Uzzi. November 2018. "The Reverse Matthew Effect: Consequences of Retraction in Scientific Teams." Review of Economics and Statistics.
LinkedIn Logo Share Chain Link Link Email Printer Print Republish
Most Popular This Week
  1. Is This a Job for a Human or AI?
    Five questions to ask before delegating an office project to your new computer coworker.
  2. What Hostage Diplomacy Can Teach Us About Everyday Negotiation
    Start by looking beyond the person at the other end of the table.
  3. The Costly Gap Between Two Career Ladders
    Managers earn more than individual contributors—even when their work is comparable.
  4. There’s a Higher Bar for Working from Home
    Remote job postings demand more skills and experience than similar in-person positions, which could limit opportunities for early-career workers.
  5. 5 Telltale Signs That a Photo Is AI-generated
    For one, scour for details that defy the laws of physics.
  6. Why Is the U.S. Stock Market Outpacing Europe’s?
    A $3 trillion gap in 2008 grew to a $34 trillion gap in 2023. Economists found a secret ingredient.
  7. Take 5: Time to Negotiate
    How broadening your perspective, biding your time, and avoiding binaries can lead to a better solution for all parties.
  8. Emotional Intelligence Is Key to Strong Leadership. Here’s How to Sharpen Yours.
    A professor and executive coach offers tips for developing different components of EQ.
  9. What AI “Synth Personas” Can and Can’t Reveal About Real Customers
    AI-generated composites are useful tools for marketers, but the nuances of actual humans are difficult to replicate.
More in Careers
The Costly Gap Between Two Career Ladders
About Us Faculty & Research Research Hub
2211 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208
insight@kellogg.northwestern.edu
LinkedIn LinkedIn Substack Substack Substack RSS
© Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern
University. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.