Strategy Sep 6, 2017

The Sci­ence Behind the Grow­ing Impor­tance of Collaboration

Plus, ideas for design­ing spaces that encour­age employ­ees to team up in unique ways.

Yevgenia Nayberg

Based on the research and insights of

Benjamin F. Jones

Col­lab­o­ra­tion is a hot buzz­word in the busi­ness world. And with good rea­son. Work­ing with peo­ple who have dif­fer­ent per­spec­tives or areas of exper­tise can result in bet­ter ideas and outcomes. 

Add Insight
to your inbox.

We’ll send you one email a week with content you actually want to read, curated by the Insight team.

Sign up here

But col­lab­o­ra­tion does not always just hap­pen. Some­times it needs a lit­tle nudge. 

Kellogg’s Ben­jamin Jones, a strat­e­gy pro­fes­sor at the Kel­logg School, dis­cuss­es why col­lab­o­ra­tion is so impor­tant today — and how orga­ni­za­tions can design their build­ings and com­mon spaces to encour­age it. 

Niche Knowl­edge

Why is col­lab­o­ra­tion necessary? 

Part of the answer — and a grow­ing part, accord­ing to Jones’s research—is that our indi­vid­ual knowl­edge base is becom­ing more and more specialized. 

There’s more and more to know in the world, and you can only have so much in your head,” he says. So the share of stuff you know as an indi­vid­ual is declin­ing in any field.” 

Jones points to the Wright Broth­ers as an exam­ple. In 1903, two men designed and flew an air­plane. Today, a Boe­ing 787 has dozens of spe­cial­ists work­ing on the engines alone. Then there are the con­trols, the hydraulics, the air­frame itself. 

There’s just so much going on in design­ing, build­ing, and fly­ing that plane,” Jones says. There is an incred­i­ble range of spe­cial­ized skills.” 

Mean­ing, you are unlike­ly to build a plane today as an avi­a­tion gen­er­al­ist. It is the col­lab­o­ra­tion among all those spe­cial­ists that gets it off the ground. And the same goes for teams at oth­er fac­to­ries or offices. 

Team­ing Up

This increas­ing spe­cial­iza­tion of skills means that you need big­ger and big­ger groups, with more and more spe­cial­ists, in order to be successful. 

Over time, this is an ongo­ing, nev­er-end­ing phe­nom­e­non of increased spe­cial­iza­tion, which is ever increas­ing the demand for col­lab­o­ra­tion,” Jones says.

Jones, along with Bri­an Uzzi, a pro­fes­sor of man­age­ment and orga­ni­za­tions at the Kel­logg School, demon­strat­ed this in research that focused on the world of aca­d­e­m­ic publishing. 

They exam­ined 30 years’ worth of sci­en­tif­ic papers — more than 19 mil­lion over­all — and found that col­lab­o­ra­tion among sci­en­tists and across research insti­tu­tions grew steadi­ly from the 1950s on. 

There’s more and more to know in the world, and you can only have so much in your head. So the share of stuff you know as an indi­vid­ual is declin­ing in any field.” 

And it was not just quan­ti­ty, but qual­i­ty that was impact­ed, the researchers found. By iden­ti­fy­ing the high­est-impact, game-chang­ing papers — as mea­sured by how often they were cit­ed by fel­low sci­en­tists — Jones and Uzzi found that col­lab­o­ra­tion pro­vides a sig­nif­i­cant boost. 

In every­thing, teams beat solo,” Jones says. In the 1950s and 60s, in lots of fields, solo beat teams. It’s flipped. Now teams always have a high­er home-run prob­a­bil­i­ty than solo.” 

Adding Just Enough Spice

But sim­ply adding more and more peo­ple to a team does not guar­an­tee suc­cess. There is an art to col­lab­o­ra­tion, too. 

In anoth­er project with Uzzi, the researchers turned again to the realm of aca­d­e­m­ic research, this time ask­ing: were the most high-impact papers very con­ven­tion­al in the way they inte­grat­ed ideas, or were they very novel? 

Are they com­bin­ing things that every­one else is com­bin­ing?” Jones says. Or are they com­bin­ing things togeth­er that no one’s combining?” 

They found that the sweet spot was when research was most­ly con­ven­tion­al but had just a lit­tle bit of novelty. 

The most suc­cess­ful papers, are most­ly hyper-con­ven­tion­al,” Jones says, real­ly deep in an area everyone’s seen before. And then there’s a lit­tle bit of spice.” 

Find­ing the right bal­ance is the key. 

If the whole thing is spicy, it does bad­ly,” he says. If it’s hyper-con­ven­tion­al with no spice, it does bad­ly. So you’ve got to be real­ly ground­ed, but then you’ve got to mix in some­thing unexpected.” 

This sweet spot applies far out­side the realm of sci­en­tif­ic research. Take con­sumer goods — par­tic­u­lar­ly those that involve new technology. 

So many con­sumer prod­ucts that are nov­el, when you look at them, have all these con­ven­tion­al fea­tures that they don’t actu­al­ly need,” Jones says. 

He pulls out his phone and takes a pic­ture to demonstrate. 

Hear that click? It’s a click just like a cam­era,” he says. Why? They could have had it go boop,’ or it could have vibrat­ed or it could have said, banana.’ But instead it makes that click. You’re used to that sound as a con­sumer, so you’re comfortable.” 

Lay­ing the Ground­work for Col­lab­o­ra­tion

What can orga­ni­za­tions do to encour­age the next break­through prod­uct or idea? How can they ensure that lit­tle bit of spice, that team­ing up of spe­cial­ists in new ways? 

One solu­tion is to, quite lit­er­al­ly, make space for peo­ple to meet poten­tial col­lab­o­ra­tors they may not oth­er­wise run into. 

Pixar is a per­fect exam­ple, Jones says. 

Pixar designed its head­quar­ters in Cal­i­for­nia with all the bath­rooms in the cen­ter of the build­ing, and all the food and cof­fee in the cen­ter in an atri­um,” Jones says. They were very inten­tion­al about want­i­ng peo­ple who are artists and ani­ma­tors, and the coders, and the music peo­ple, and the screen writ­ers to be con­stant­ly bump­ing into each oth­er in ran­dom ways to spark ideas.” 

Com­pa­ny lead­ers can also hold events — from putting out bagels in the morn­ing to after­noon hap­py hours — in these cen­tral spaces to encour­age mix­ing and min­gling of ideas, Jones says. 

At Kel­logg, the new Glob­al Hub build­ing opened this spring with col­lab­o­ra­tive space at its core. And, Jones says, it is work­ing. He has already start­ed talk­ing about poten­tial new col­lab­o­ra­tions with peo­ple out­side his department. 

You’re bump­ing into peo­ple and you’re hav­ing con­ver­sa­tions that you wouldn’t oth­er­wise have,” he says. I’m talk­ing to a finance per­son, to a mar­ket­ing per­son, to a sociologist.” 

Not every inter­ac­tion is going to lead to a home run, he says. But that’s okay. 

Many of those inter­ac­tions are going to be dead ends,” from a col­lab­o­ra­tive point of view, Jones says. But I think it cre­ates the greater prob­a­bil­i­ty of cre­at­ing some inter­ac­tions where you’re like, Hey, wait a sec­ond. We should talk.’” 

Featured Faculty

Benjamin F. Jones

Professor of Strategy; Faculty Director, Kellogg Innovation and Entrepreneurship Initiative (KIEI)

About the Writer

Emily Stone is the senior research editor of Kellogg Insight.

Editor’s Picks


Pod­cast: How to Be a Great Mentor

Plus, some valu­able career advice that applies to just about everyone.


A New Way to Per­suade Kids to Drink More Water and Less Soda

Get­ting chil­dren to make healthy choic­es is tricky — and the wrong mes­sage can backfire.


How Can Social Sci­ence Become More Solutions-Oriented?

A con­ver­sa­tion between researchers at Kel­logg and Microsoft explores how behav­ioral sci­ence can best be applied.


Buy­ing a Com­pa­ny for Its Tal­ent? Beware of Hid­den Legal Risks.

Acquir­ing anoth­er firm’s trade secrets — even unin­ten­tion­al­ly — could prove costly.


Take 5: Tips for Widen­ing — and Improv­ing — Your Can­di­date Pool

Com­mon bias­es can cause com­pa­nies to over­look a wealth of top talent.


Every­one Wants Phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal Break­throughs. What Dri­ves Drug Com­pa­nies to Pur­sue Them?

A new study sug­gests that firms are at their most inno­v­a­tive after a finan­cial windfall.


4 Key Steps to Prepar­ing for a Busi­ness Presentation

Don’t let a lack of prep work sab­o­tage your great ideas.


Video: How Open Lines of Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Can Improve Health­care Outcomes

Train­ing physi­cians to be bet­ter com­mu­ni­ca­tors builds trust with patients and their loved ones.


Here’s a Bet­ter Way to Sched­ule Surgeries

A new tool could dri­ve sav­ings of 20 per­cent while still keep­ing sur­geons happy.

Politics & Elections

Why Eco­nom­ic Crises Trig­ger Polit­i­cal Turnover in Some Coun­tries but Not Others

The fall­out can hinge on how much a country’s peo­ple trust each other.


Build­ing Strong Brands: The Inside Scoop on Brand­ing in the Real World

Tim Calkins’s blog draws lessons from brand mis­steps and triumphs.


How the Cof­fee Indus­try Is Build­ing a Sus­tain­able Sup­ply Chain in an Unsta­ble Region

Three experts dis­cuss the chal­lenges and rewards of sourc­ing cof­fee from the Demo­c­ra­t­ic Repub­lic of Congo.