How Former Enemies Can Develop Trust
Skip to content
Policy Aug 1, 2022

How Former Enemies Can Develop Trust

A simple intervention can help diffuse animosity toward onetime armed foes, a study shows.

Based on the research of

Emile Bruneau

Andres Casas

Boaz Hameiri

Nour Kteily

For groups that have been in armed conflict for years, trust rarely develops overnight. Wariness toward former enemies can linger long after formal peace processes conclude. Indeed, continued mistrust can undermine those very processes, reviving the same fights again and again.

Colombia offers a prime example of this phenomenon: Violent conflict between the Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC) and the government dates back to the 1960s. Despite a peace deal approved in 2016, ex-FARC members have struggled to reintegrate into society. This is likely due in part to the fact that many Colombians have never met a current or former FARC member, and that lack of contact has allowed animosity to flourish.

Nour Kteily, a professor of management and organizations at the Kellogg School, wanted to explore how this animosity could be diffused. He and coauthors found that a simple intervention can help overcome some misgivings about former foes. Watching a five-minute video featuring interviews with FARC ex-combatants increased support for peace and reintegration among non-FARC Colombians—a shift in attitude that persisted for three months after seeing the video.

The research was coauthored by Andrés Casas, at the United Nations University, and Boaz Hameiri, while at the University of Pennsylvania, as well as Emile Bruneau, who died last fall, who was also at the University of Pennsylvania.

“This research is proof of principle,” Kteily explains. “It’s not to say that all we need to do is show Colombians a five-minute video and we’re going to solve the problem. But what it does show is there is a potential for media interventions to change minds.”

Understanding Mistrust of the FARC

To design a video that would most effectively change attitudes toward ex-FARC members, the researchers first wanted to understand how non-FARC Colombians thought about them. So they surveyed a demographically representative group of 435 non-FARC Colombians.

“There were a variety of things that emerged reliably in people’s responses, but one of the things that seemed to matter a lot was the belief that former FARC members weren’t able or willing to change their violent ways,” Kteily says. This belief strongly correlated with high degrees of dehumanization toward ex-FARC members, low support for the peace process, and low support for reintegration policies such as scholarships for ex-FARC members and their families.

With the survey data in hand, the researchers partnered with a production company to develop videos that would specifically target the belief that former FARC members are unwilling to change. The production company interviewed ex-FARC members living in a demobilization camp and non-FARC members from a nearby town. The clips described mutually positive experiences, such as ex-FARC and non-FARC Colombians coming together to form soccer teams, hosting bingo nights for charity, and collectively repairing a local road after a flood.

“Whereas politicians broker peace, it really falls to the populace to implement it.”

— Nour Kteily

Colombia offers a prime example of this phenomenon: Violent conflict between the Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC) and the government dates back to the 1960s. Despite a peace deal approved in 2016, ex-FARC members have struggled to reintegrate into society. This is likely due in part to the fact that many Colombians have never met a current or former FARC member, and that lack of contact has allowed animosity to flourish.

Nour Kteily, a professor of management and organizations at the Kellogg School, wanted to explore how this animosity could be diffused. He and coauthors found that a simple intervention can help overcome some misgivings about former foes. Watching a five-minute video featuring interviews with FARC ex-combatants increased support for peace and reintegration among non-FARC Colombians—a shift in attitude that persisted for three months after seeing the video.

The research was coauthored by Andrés Casas, at the United Nations University, and Boaz Hameiri, while at the University of Pennsylvania, as well as Emile Bruneau, who died last fall, who was also at the University of Pennsylvania.

“This research is proof of principle,” Kteily explains. “It’s not to say that all we need to do is show Colombians a five-minute video and we’re going to solve the problem. But what it does show is there is a potential for media interventions to change minds.”

Understanding Mistrust of the FARC

To design a video that would most effectively change attitudes toward ex-FARC members, the researchers first wanted to understand how non-FARC Colombians thought about them. So they surveyed a demographically representative group of 435 non-FARC Colombians.

“There were a variety of things that emerged reliably in people’s responses, but one of the things that seemed to matter a lot was the belief that former FARC members weren’t able or willing to change their violent ways,” Kteily says. This belief strongly correlated with high degrees of dehumanization toward ex-FARC members, low support for the peace process, and low support for reintegration policies such as scholarships for ex-FARC members and their families.

With the survey data in hand, the researchers partnered with a production company to develop videos that would specifically target the belief that former FARC members are unwilling to change. The production company interviewed ex-FARC members living in a demobilization camp and non-FARC members from a nearby town. The clips described mutually positive experiences, such as ex-FARC and non-FARC Colombians coming together to form soccer teams, hosting bingo nights for charity, and collectively repairing a local road after a flood.

Then, the researchers recruited about 2,300 non-FARC Colombians to complete an online study. Participants were shown one of 11 different videos that varied in several ways, including whether they stressed ex-FARC members’ willingness to change or focused on humanizing them. (A control condition saw no video at all.) Then, participants answered a series of questions designed to assess their levels of empathy, dehumanization, and prejudice toward ex-FARC members; how much the participants believed that ex-FARC members were willing to change; and their support for the peace process and reintegration.

The researchers followed up with the same group of participants 10–12 weeks later and asked them to answer the same set of questions again.

After collecting these data, the researchers identified the video that was most effective relative to the others they tested. Because this cut had a slight edge over the others they tried, the researchers focused on it in their statistical analysis and in subsequent studies.

Participants who saw this video had improved attitudes toward ex-FARC members compared with the control group—not just in the short term, but also weeks later. Participants who saw the video rated FARC members as being more willing to change (by 18 points on a 100-point scale). The participants also exhibited more empathy and less dehumanization, and expressed more support for peace and reintegration. (While participants who saw the video initially showed decreased prejudice toward ex-FARC member, this effect disappeared during the second phase of data collection.)

To Kteily, the persistence of the improved attitudes was especially important. All too often, interventions appear to work, but “it’s fragile,” he explains. “People leave, they go out into the real world. What seemed like a robust, reliable effect dissipates quickly.” Seeing that participants still felt more positive toward ex-FARC members not just immediately after watching the video, but also 10–12 weeks later “gave us confidence there was real ‘there’ there.”

Changing Attitudes and Behaviors

In a subsequent study, in order to confirm that the effect could be repeated, the researchers reran the initial experiment using only the most successful version of the video and got similar results.

In a third study, they tested how these improved attitudes affected real-world behavior. This time, participants in the video and control groups were asked to imagine they were hiring for various open positions, such as bank teller, taxi driver, and nurse. For each position, participants saw a resume that indicated the applicant was a former FARC member. Then, for each position, participants rated how likely they were to hire the candidate.

In addition, at the end of the study, participants had the option to donate a percentage of their roughly $1 study compensation to an ecotourism organization founded by ex-FARC members.

Seeing the video affected both choices, the researchers found. Compared with the control group, video group participants expressed more willingness to hire ex-FARC members and donated 11 percent more of their compensation to the ex-FARC nonprofit organization.

This study showed that the videos had practical effects beyond improving attitudes. “It’s one thing to ask in the abstract, ‘Do you think that you support reintegration efforts?’” Kteily explains. “It’s another to actually look at a variety of resumes and endorse hiring someone.”

Building Trust, Increasing Peace

Videos alone can’t end conflict, of course. But Kteily says it’s important to remember that “whereas politicians broker peace, it really falls to the populace to implement it. If people are unwilling to support it on a day-to-day basis, if they’re not willing to hire members of a group they were formerly in conflict with, if they’re not willing to forgive them, then peace is not sustainable.”

After all, he points out, there are high rates of recidivism for civil conflict around the world, not just in Colombia. A peace treaty that seems promising in theory can easily erode. That’s why it’s so crucial to focus not just on treaties and policies, but also on hearts and minds.

“It’s really important to think about how you can shape people’s attitudes towards creating sustainable peace, beyond just banking on the fact that there was a political process and a peace deal,” he says. “That’s not the end of the story. It’s actually just the beginning.”

Featured Faculty

Professor of Management & Organizations

About the Writer

Susie Allen is a freelance writer in Chicago.

About the Research

Bruneau, Emile, Andres Casas, Boaz Hameiri, and Nour Kteily. 2022. “Exposure to a Media Intervention Helps Promote Peace in Colombia.” Nature Human Behaviour.

Read the original

Most Popular This Week
  1. How Are Black–White Biracial People Perceived in Terms of Race?
    Understanding the answer—and why black and white Americans may percieve biracial people differently—is increasingly important in a multiracial society.
    How are biracial people perceived in terms of race
  2. Don’t Wait to Be Asked: Lead
    A roadmap for increasing your influence at work.
    An employee leads by jumping from the bleachers and joining the action.
  3. How (Not) to Change Someone’s Mind
    Psychologists have found two persuasion tactics that work. But put them together and the magic is lost.
    A woman on a street talks through a large megaphone.
  4. Which Form of Government Is Best?
    Democracies may not outlast dictatorships, but they adapt better.
    Is democracy the best form of government?
  5. How Autocracies Unravel
    Over time, leaders grow more repressive and cling to yes-men—a cycle that’s playing out today in Putin’s Russia.
    autocrat leaning over battle map surrounded by yes-men.
  6. Knowing Your Boss’s Salary Can Make You Work Harder—or Slack Off
    Your level of motivation depends on whether you have a fair shot at getting promoted yourself.
    person climbin ladder with missing rungs toward rich boss surrounded by money bags on platform
  7. Sitting Near a High-Performer Can Make You Better at Your Job
    “Spillover” from certain coworkers can boost our productivity—or jeopardize our employment.
    The spillover effect in offices impacts workers in close physical proximity.
  8. It’s Performance Review Time. Which Ranking System Is Best for Your Team?
    A look at the benefits and downsides of two different approaches.
    An employee builds a staircase for his boss.
  9. Will AI Eventually Replace Doctors?
    Maybe not entirely. But the doctor–patient relationship is likely to change dramatically.
    doctors offices in small nodules
  10. Why Do Some People Succeed after Failing, While Others Continue to Flounder?
    A new study dispels some of the mystery behind success after failure.
    Scientists build a staircase from paper
  11. Four Strategies for Cultivating Strong Leaders Internally
    A retired brigadier general explains how companies can prioritize talent development.
    Companies should adopt intentional leadership strategies since developing leaders internally is critical to success.
  12. Take 5: Not So Fast!
    A little patience can lead to better ideas, stronger organizations, and more-ethical conduct at work.
  13. Too Much Cross Talk. Too Little Creativity. How to Fix the Worst Parts of a Virtual Meeting.
    Six tools from an unlikely place—improv comedy—to use on your next Zoom call.
    meeting participants improv
  14. Take 5: How to Be Prepared for Important Career Moments
    Expert advice on getting ready to network, negotiate, or make your case to the CEO.
    How to be prepared
  15. Entrepreneurship Through Acquisition Is Still Entrepreneurship
    ETA is one of the fastest-growing paths to entrepreneurship. Here's how to think about it.
    An entrepreneur strides toward a business for sale.
  16. Why Do Long Wars Happen?
    War is a highly inefficient way of dividing contested resources—yet conflicts endure when there are powerful incentives to feign strength.
    long line of soldiers marching single file through a field
  17. 5 Tips for Growing as a Leader without Burning Yourself Out
    A leadership coach and former CEO on how to take a holistic approach to your career.
    father picking up kids from school
  18. 2 Factors Will Determine How Much AI Transforms Our Economy
    They’ll also dictate how workers stand to fare.
    robot waiter serves couple in restaurant
  19. What Went Wrong at AIG?
    Unpacking the insurance giant's collapse during the 2008 financial crisis.
    What went wrong during the AIG financial crisis?
More in Business Insights Finance & Accounting