Cashing In on Cute
Skip to content
Cashing In on Cute
Marketing Mar 1, 2026

Cashing In on Cute

Marketers, take note: there’s a strong connection between one’s political leanings and a preference for “cute” product aesthetics.

Michael Meier

Based on the research of

Carolyn W. Keller

Chethana Achar

Summary Companies occasionally give their products or packaging a cute aesthetic—childlike features such as a rounded face, larger eyes, round cheeks—to increase consumer appeal. In a series of studies across thousands of participants in the U.S., UK, and India, researchers found that political conservatives were more likely than political liberals not only to like these cute products but to buy them as well. One of the main reasons driving this behavior was the way conservatives associated cuteness with their core values of innocence and bodily purity.

Cuteness is having a moment in the marketplace.

The fervor around cute products has spread well beyond children’s plush toys like Labubu and Squishmallow to cell-phone cases and even credit-card designs. And countless companies are leveraging this cute aesthetic—either in the product itself or its packaging—to increase consumer appeal.

“In marketing research, we have mostly focused on the consequences of the cute aesthetic”—whether a product design with cute versus plain imagery will get more people to buy the product, says Chethana Achar, a Kellogg associate professor of marketing.

But Achar and her colleague, Carolyn Wells Keller, a Kellogg alumna who is now a lecturer at Northwestern’s Medill School, wanted to explore if consumer preferences for cute products are influenced by individual differences between consumers.

“Research on moral intuition and moral foundations suggests that people who endorse politically conservative beliefs, compared with those with more-liberal views, prioritize values related to bodily purity and sanctity,” Achar says.

Building upon this research, Achar and Keller conducted a series of studies across thousands of participants in the U.S., UK, and India to better understand how someone’s political ideology might influence their response to the cute aesthetic.

They confirmed that political conservatives were more likely than political liberals not only to like cute products but to buy them as well. One of the main reasons driving this behavior, they found, was the way conservatives associated cuteness with core values such as innocence and bodily purity.

“If you’re more politically conservative, you’re drawn to this childlike-cuteness aesthetic because of its moral congruence with valuing bodily purity,” Achar says.

Cuteness and purity

For their study, Achar and Keller focused on a specific meaning of “cute.”

“Cuteness in this case means childlike features: rounded face, larger eyes, round cheeks,” Achar says. That’s in contrast to a more whimsical type of cuteness, like stylized imagery of polka dots or clouds, or “things that evoke a capricious feeling.”

In one of their experiments, the researchers showed 868 participants a gift card that featured one of three designs: a smiling baby with large eyes and a round body (a cute design), polka dots in saturated colors (a whimsical design), or a white background (a plain design).

“If you’re more politically conservative, you’re drawn to this childlike-cuteness aesthetic because of its moral congruence with valuing bodily purity.”

—

Chethana Achar

They found that political conservatives were more likely than liberals to be interested in the card with the childlike cute design, but not the whimsical cute design, and more likely to say they would buy it. Conservatives were also more likely to agree that the cute design, but not the other designs, appeared innocent and childlike.

Similar findings emerged when the team conducted follow-up studies using different types of products—such as a water bottle, laptop, and sticker—as well as for people in various countries, including the U.S., UK, and India. “It’s a very cross-cultural effect,” Achar says.

The pattern held when looking at consumer search behavior, too. The researchers examined Google searches for a wide range of products over a yearlong period and discovered that people were more likely to be interested in “cute” products—based on how frequently they included the term in their searches—in U.S. states where a higher proportion of conservatives resided.

Moral foundations

Achar and Keller’s research stems from well-established studies and theories related to people’s morals.

“The theory is that we all have several big moral foundations—such as fairness or purity—and researchers have mapped different ideologies onto those foundations,” Achar says.

For example, research has shown there is a stronger connection between liberal ideology and fairness, and a stronger connection between conservative ideology and purity.

That context helps explain why Achar and Keller repeatedly found that conservatives preferred cute products—since they associated the cute aesthetic with purity and innocence. The researchers even found that aesthetic preferences were aligned with people’s stance on specific issues. In one study, for instance, people who were anti abortion or anti same-sex marriage—stances that have traditionally been tied to sexual purity—were more likely to prefer cute products than those with opposing views.

Conversely, the association broke when a product itself was associated with impurity or promiscuity. In one study, for example, the researchers assessed people’s responses to two different products with a childlike-cute design: a mug and a condom. Conservatives were more interested in the cute mug than liberals were, as expected, but conservatives were not more interested in the condom.

“If a product is associated with (perceived) promiscuity, then the childlike-cuteness aesthetic is no longer morally congruent, and we don’t see the effect,” Achar says. “It gets turned off because the product itself is considered impure from a bodily purity perspective.”

Marketing with cuteness

What lessons can business and marketing leaders take from these findings?

For one, there’s a strong connection between values and aesthetics for a product or branding. “Ideological values have typically been associated with things like activism, voting, and donations—prosocial things,” Achar says. “Our work shows that values have a connection to even visual aspects of consumption. If something as simple as a mug, which has a pretty clear, consistent function, is visually more consistent with your values, then it would be more attractive to you.”

That reality has clear implications for how companies and marketers can use aesthetics to strategically market their products or ideas to different audiences. All too often, ideology-focused marketing tactics amount to preaching to the choir.

As Achar points out, “Before our research, we looked at a lot of anti-abortion campaigns, and many were leaning toward a childlike-cuteness aesthetic, targeting politically conservative people” who already likely favored such policies.

But the research results suggest that campaigns might be able to get more bang for their buck by, instead, targeting a group that does not naturally gravitate toward their products or offerings using an aesthetic that appeals to that group’s values.

“Imagine a marketing manager wants to promote a green, sustainable product and talk across the aisle to political conservatives,” Achar says. “Using a childlike-cuteness aesthetic should be more effective than a neutral aesthetic.”

About the Writer

Sachin Waikar is a freelance writer based in Evanston, Illinois.

About the Research

Keller, Carolyn W., and Chethana Achar. 2025. “Conservatives’ Preference for Kinderschema Cute Products: Value Congruence in Evaluations of Product Aesthetics.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

Read the original

Most Popular This Week
  1. Is This a Job for a Human or AI?
    Five questions to ask before delegating an office project to your new computer coworker.
  2. What Hostage Diplomacy Can Teach Us About Everyday Negotiation
    Start by looking beyond the person at the other end of the table.
  3. The Costly Gap Between Two Career Ladders
    Managers earn more than individual contributors—even when their work is comparable.
  4. There’s a Higher Bar for Working from Home
    Remote job postings demand more skills and experience than similar in-person positions, which could limit opportunities for early-career workers.
  5. 5 Telltale Signs That a Photo Is AI-generated
    For one, scour for details that defy the laws of physics.
  6. Why Is the U.S. Stock Market Outpacing Europe’s?
    A $3 trillion gap in 2008 grew to a $34 trillion gap in 2023. Economists found a secret ingredient.
  7. Take 5: Time to Negotiate
    How broadening your perspective, biding your time, and avoiding binaries can lead to a better solution for all parties.
  8. Emotional Intelligence Is Key to Strong Leadership. Here’s How to Sharpen Yours.
    A professor and executive coach offers tips for developing different components of EQ.
  9. What AI “Synth Personas” Can and Can’t Reveal About Real Customers
    AI-generated composites are useful tools for marketers, but the nuances of actual humans are difficult to replicate.
More in Marketing
2211 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208
© Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern
University. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.